Reading on-screen vs reading in print: What’s the difference for learning?

Online and Connected
The online world is vast and there is no sign of data creation slowing down. Our digital experience is enhanced by media-rich content and quick links to other sites, offering convenience, the flexibility of approach, and often cheaper costs than print materials. We have instant knowledge of world events and everyone’s reaction to them and can, in turn, instantly react and contribute ourselves.
But not all of this information is unbiased or even relevant to our needs, and the speed at which events are reported gives us little time to evaluate sources, think critically or engage in considered reflection. As Susan Greenfield, a neuroscientist from Oxford University, comments:

The issue is that information isn’t knowledge. Of course, you can be bombarded with endless information, endless facts but if you can’t make sense of them, one fact is the same as any other fact. You can cruise on YouTube or on Google going ‘yuck’ and ‘wow’, but you’re not actually making sense of things.
So do our digital reading practices foster the reflection and deep reading necessary to evaluate and respond thoughtfully to all of this data?

In 2005, researcher Ziming Liu noted that:

With an increasing amount of time spent reading electronic documents, a screen‐based reading behavior is emerging. [This]… behavior is characterized by more time spent on browsing and scanning, keyword spotting, one‐time reading, non‐linear reading, and reading more selectively, while less time is spent on in‐depth reading, and concentrated reading.

Research comparing print and digital reading experiences

In Scholastics’ 2012 report, kids say that eBooks are better than print books when they do not want their friends to know what they are reading, and when they are out and about/traveling. The print is better for sharing with friends and reading at bedtime.

Naomi Baron (2016) compared how students read in print and on-screen, and reports that participants ‘praised digital reading on a number of counts, including the ability to read in the dark, ease of finding material (“plenty of quick information”) saving paper and even the fact they could multitask while reading.’

In Baron’s 2017 article, Reading in a digital age, her review of related research included a 2011 study by Ackerman and Goldsmith. This study noted that when students have a choice, they spent less time on digital reading, and had lower comprehension scores. Schugar et al (2011) also found that participants reading on-screen used fewer study strategies such as note-taking. More recent research (Kaufman and Flanagan, 2016) cited by Baron found that students reading digitally did well on answering concrete questions while those reading in print did better on abstract questions needing inferential reasoning.

In Baron’s own study, with more than 400 university students from five countries, 86% preferred reading longer texts in print and 78% when reading for pleasure, with 92% saying it was easiest to concentrate when reading print. 85% of the US students were more likely to multitask in an online environment and only 26% when reading print.

New Zealand research

New Zealand researchers, Hooper and Herath (2014), determined that the impact of the online environment on university students’ reading included:
  • increased amount of reading due to the growth of online material
  • improved speed of reading
  • improved skimming ability
The impact also included:
  • change in patience as readers
  • multitasking
  • distraction
  • eye strain
  • scanning rather than reading through (in print 82% of participants read from beginning to end)

Multitasking in a fast-paced world

Sally Blundell recently interviewed neuroscientist Maryanne Wolf for The New Zealand Listener. As Blundell and Wolf note:

‘By and large, reading on a screen encourages multitasking, a different form of attention, a different speed of processing’. And if people are skim, skim, skimming, she tells the Listener, ‘and not going deeper to understand the complexity of issues, they will be far more attracted to false news or worse’ … But there is a concern, she says, that digital media and the sheer volume of online information and communication invite the fast and shallow read. The result, she writes, is more and more young people not reading other than what is required, ‘and often not even that: “tl; dr” (too long; didn’t read)’.

The issues are more compelling for even younger students as their adaptation to a fast-paced digital world may be changing their brains and influencing their ability to develop these skills.
Our brain circuits are being rewired

The very plasticity of our brain, the ability to respond and adapt to our environment, and its challenges that has kept our species alive for millennia also encourage it to take on the characteristics of whatever medium it is reading on.
Researchers Schugar et. al (2013) worked with middle-grade students and found that those who read print comprehended more than those who read an eBook on an iPad. This is further confirmed by Reich, Yau, and Warschauer in their 2016 report on using tablet-based eBooks with very young children (0 to 2 years), which comments that enhanced eBooks with sounds, animations, and games can distract children and reduce learning. When book-sharing with an adult, conversations during eBook reading are often about the platform while print book conversations are more often about the book content.

However, these same researchers have also found that with eBooks that are carefully designed to support reading rather than distract with features that are simply entertainment, the children’s comprehension of a story was at a similar level.
Best of both worlds
Both print and online reading are thoroughly established in our students’ daily lives.
Online reading has evolved to allow the quick perusal of a lot of information very quickly — a great strategy for scanning through email for example. Additionally, eBooks and digital technology can be very engaging for reluctant readers. The National Literacy Trust’s study of children’s access to eBooks found that:
…boys’ reading levels increased by an average of 8.4 months, compared to 7.2 months’ progress made by girls. Furthermore, the percentage of boys that felt reading was difficult almost halved from 28.0% to 15.9%, suggesting that confidence in their own reading ability increased as a result of the project. In addition, the percentage that felt reading was cool rose from 34.4% to 66.5%.
Baron reports that the students in her study commented that print was aesthetically more enjoyable (‘I like the smell of paper’) and that print gave them a sense of where they were in the book — they could see and feel where they were in the text.
So it’s not an either/or choice but a matter of how we get the best out of both. Wolf suggests that we need to teach our students which medium best suits the purpose for which we are reading. Her best hope for our reading future is the ‘bi-literate’ brain — one that uses the optimal skills of each reading style so that students can read deeply as well online as in print.
Source Credit:
Looking for Teaching – Learning E-resources?
Buy any PHI e-book from a list of over 1200+ e-books of your choice
Purchase Benefits of PHI e-books
  • No Shipping and Handling Charges
  • No Expiry for e-books
  • Read it offline anytime, anywhere
PHI e-books (Adobe Digital Editions): Value Added Features
  • Lifetime Access 
  • Download and Transfer of e-books between Devices
  • No Purchasing of Special Software Required
  • Recovery of Lost E-books
  • Ease to Access
  • Technical/Customer Support 
Download and Access PHI e-books in Three Easy Steps!!!
Download and Install Adobe Digital Editions (Free Software)
Authorize Adobe Digital Editions with your Adobe ID
Buy and Download PHI e-books from

Get a copy of the print book/digital book from 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *